Community FAQ
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
dbcoleman
Engaged Sweeper
Hello all. So I made a copy of the built in "All Workstations" report, and added and rearranged some fields. It seems to be all okay except for one thing. I compared the results of my report to the built in report, and it shows about 10 less workstations. I searched these workstations in lansweeper and they are active and online.
Why would my report be so much different than the built in one? All I did was add fields and moved them around, that shouldn't change the results... right?
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Susan_A
Lansweeper Alumni
If you add tables, this can reduce the result count, even if you didn't add filters. By default, SQL only displays a record in the report output if there is a record in both linked tables. This is standard SQL behavior, not specific to Lansweeper. If you link a table that a computer doesn't have a record in, that computer will no longer be listed. You can right-click on all links between tblAssets and other tables and tick "select all rows from tblAssets" to force all assets in tblAssets to be displayed.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Susan_A
Lansweeper Alumni
If you add tables, this can reduce the result count, even if you didn't add filters. By default, SQL only displays a record in the report output if there is a record in both linked tables. This is standard SQL behavior, not specific to Lansweeper. If you link a table that a computer doesn't have a record in, that computer will no longer be listed. You can right-click on all links between tblAssets and other tables and tick "select all rows from tblAssets" to force all assets in tblAssets to be displayed.

Reports & Analytics

Ask about reports you're interested in and share reports you've created. Subscribe to receive daily updates of reports shared in the Community.

New to Lansweeper?

Try Lansweeper For Free

Experience Lansweeper with your own data.
Sign up now for a 14-day free trial.

Try Now