
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-24-2013 10:27 AM
Hello,
currently standard user group "everyone" is set to Full Access
on Lansweeper Subfolder "Service" (path example: c:\program files\lansweeper\service).
That is a vulnerability according to regular Nessus scans.
Is this Access Level required to run the service or just to let users
put lspush result files into subsubfolder "import" ?
For now I have to modify Acl after each patch installation.
Maybe that could be changed.
Thank you,
Mike
currently standard user group "everyone" is set to Full Access
on Lansweeper Subfolder "Service" (path example: c:\program files\lansweeper\service).
That is a vulnerability according to regular Nessus scans.
Is this Access Level required to run the service or just to let users
put lspush result files into subsubfolder "import" ?
For now I have to modify Acl after each patch installation.
Maybe that could be changed.
Thank you,
Mike
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Archive
4 REPLIES 4

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-24-2013 03:26 PM
Thank you.

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-24-2013 02:40 PM
If you want you can change the settings manually after upgrading.

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-24-2013 12:39 PM
Hi,
that folder is not shared.
But is there any reason why not to place "everyone" only on the import subfolder?
As long as Nessus is detecting it as a vulnerability it is required to change
it manually for PCI purposes. (see screenshot)
Maybe it's also a good point to minimize access to the folders at all. (least privilege)
Greetings,
Mike
that folder is not shared.
But is there any reason why not to place "everyone" only on the import subfolder?
As long as Nessus is detecting it as a vulnerability it is required to change
it manually for PCI purposes. (see screenshot)
Maybe it's also a good point to minimize access to the folders at all. (least privilege)
Greetings,
Mike

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-24-2013 11:09 AM
Is this folder shared?
Are non-administrators able to log onto your server?
Is both answers are "no" I don't see any security issues.
Are non-administrators able to log onto your server?
Is both answers are "no" I don't see any security issues.
