
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-06-2021 10:35 AM
- Labels:
-
Finished Reports
-
Report Center

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-06-2021 03:59 AM
Line 27:
Old: When tblAssets.AssetID = freespace.AssetID Then 'Pass'
New: When tblAssets.AssetID = disksize.AssetID Then 'Pass'
Line 29:
Old: End As [Disk space > 64GB],
New: End As [Disk size > 64GB],
Line 49:
Old: freespace.AssetID Then '#d4f4be'
New: disksize.AssetID Then '#d4f4be'
Line 905-906:
Old: Cast(Cast(tblDiskdrives.Freespace As bigint) / 1024 / 1024 As numeric) As free,
New: Cast(Cast(tblDiskdrives.Size As bigint) / 1024 / 1024 As numeric) As free,
Line 912-913:
Old: Where Cast(Cast(tblDiskdrives.Freespace As bigint) / 1024 / 1024 As numeric) > 64000) As freespace On freespace.AssetID = tblAssets.AssetID
New: Where Cast(Cast(tblDiskdrives.Size As bigint) / 1024 / 1024 As numeric) > 64000) As disksize On disksize.AssetID = tblAssets.AssetID

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-06-2021 03:48 AM
Just a small note that the statement below is incorrect and should not include the "[1]" part - which was for a footnote on the MS page.
Incorrect:
Line 484 | tblProcessor.name like '%Core%i7-7820HQ[1]%' or
Correct:
Line 484 | tblProcessor.name like '%Core%i7-7820HQ%' or
Cheers.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-08-2021 06:26 PM
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-11-supported-intel-processors

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-08-2021 06:07 PM
I'm hoping the list of processors the readiness report uses is early and incomplete. I find it hard to believe there are a bunch of Pentium processors that are ready for Win 11 but a bunch of Core I5 and I7 chips are not.
If this doesn't improve much I'll have to revisit the Linux option. Or retire.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-08-2021 04:39 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-30-2021 07:53 PM
doone128 wrote:
Would be great to see this report have a True/False column for machines that are determined compatible instead of just being colour coded. Makes it really easy to filter that way.
It would help alot to have that to build a case!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-06-2021 10:23 AM
Mlaurin wrote:doone128 wrote:
Would be great to see this report have a True/False column for machines that are determined compatible instead of just being colour coded. Makes it really easy to filter that way.
It would help alot to have that to build a case!
Added!
threenub wrote:
Hi,
Just a small note that the statement below is incorrect and should not include the "[1]" part - which was for a footnote on the MS page.
Incorrect:
Line 484 | tblProcessor.name like '%Core%i7-7820HQ[1]%' or
Correct:
Line 484 | tblProcessor.name like '%Core%i7-7820HQ%' or
Cheers.
Fixed.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2021 04:53 PM
It is simply how SQL works unless I remove the GPU information altogether.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-06-2021 10:18 PM
