kaarde wrote:
taeratrin wrote:
Keep in mind that this method does not fill in the user information correctly. It will show whatever you put in after the -u as being the logged-in user.
Your right, but for an initial sweep or for the purpose of trying the program this is an exellent way to scan. It's perfect if you only need hardware and software and faster than the loggin script method. Besides that I use Lansweeper for machine and software not users (they just hate being treated like numbers
)
That's why I built that deployment tool. Does basically the same thing.
You mean you don't have problems with users sending in tickets that don't mention what computer they're on? We get that all of the time, and I got sick of wasting time asking them to send in the computer name. Half the time, you'd get no response at all. The other half, you'd get a response like 'My computer name is Optiplex 740'. I implemented Lansweeper to solve this problem, and so far it's been working out well.
I did do alot of research on how to make the deployment tool (and psexec) run the process as the local session user, but it turns out to be impossible.