Community FAQ
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
BUSD
Engaged Sweeper
From almost the moment I installed LS 4 to the moment I stopped the LS service, the server was taxed at 100% CPU usage with process LSASS taking up about 85% - 90% and lansweeper taking up the rest. SQL server was taking up about 1.4GB of memory as well.

If I start the LS service again, CPU usage goes back up to 100% within 30 seconds of starting. It dips for a bit then sits at 100%. I'm assuming these 100% usages are happening when AD Scanning is going on.

I'm using Windows 2008 x64 (non-R2) with SQL Express 2005, one 2.3 GHZ single core CPU (server is a VM on vSphere), and 4 GB Memory. There are also 21 domains in our network and about ~3k workstations.

LS 3.5.2 would sometimes also tax the server at 100% but not constantly. LS 3.5.2 was running on the same hardware as above.

I'm now going to move the installation to a new VM running 2k3 R2 x86 with four 2.3 GHZ cores to see if that helps.
15 REPLIES 15
loerdy
Engaged Sweeper
Lansweeper wrote:
Is the action screen slow while your server is still at 100%


No, but now with only 1 Report in dashboard its really fast
loerdy
Engaged Sweeper
My Problem was Eventlog Scanning. set scanning to -1 and CPU is now between 40% and 60% per Core when scanning ..

OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
SP: Service Pack 2
Memory: 4096 MB
Processor: 4 * Intel Xeon CPU 3.06GHz


Domains = 10
Servers = 200
Workstation ca 2000

callup Actions site needs long time 😞

Hemoco
Lansweeper Alumni
loerdy wrote:

callup Actions site needs long time 😞

Are there any specific new reports you added to the dashboard?
loerdy
Engaged Sweeper

Are there any specific new reports you added to the dashboard?


no, but i have removed all entrys from dashboard, now is very ...


....
and homesite is ugly 🙂


is it possible to disable the scantime table on actions site?
Hemoco
Lansweeper Alumni
@BUSD: how big was the ip range you selected? Did you choose to ignore windows hosts?
AdmJLovejoy
Champion Sweeper
Had the same issue. My problem was IP Range Scanning. I found that splitting the IP Scanning ranges into smaller chucks helped bring down the utilitization.
Thanks, Jim Lovejoy __________________________________________________________________________________________________ James W. Lovejoy | IBM - Cloud Managed Services Delivery | Infrastructure Architect (Windows Server ...

Archive

This board contains archived posts from the retired Lansweeper Forum and Insiders Community.

New to Lansweeper?

Try Lansweeper For Free

Experience Lansweeper with your own data.
Sign up now for a 14-day free trial.

Try Now