
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-23-2009 11:52 AM
Hi,
We just bought the premium version of Lansweeper which seems to be a great tool !
We are now experiencing some trouble with multiple domain scanning . We are facing exactly the same issue as described here :
http://www.lansweeper.com/forum/yaf_postst1248_Multiple-domain-scanning.aspx
According to your post http://www.lansweeper.com/forum/yaf_postst1337_Confirmed-bugs-in-version-35.aspx we would get a hot fix as soon as possible. How can we get it ?
Thanks
We just bought the premium version of Lansweeper which seems to be a great tool !
We are now experiencing some trouble with multiple domain scanning . We are facing exactly the same issue as described here :
http://www.lansweeper.com/forum/yaf_postst1248_Multiple-domain-scanning.aspx
According to your post http://www.lansweeper.com/forum/yaf_postst1337_Confirmed-bugs-in-version-35.aspx we would get a hot fix as soon as possible. How can we get it ?
Thanks
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Archive
3 REPLIES 3

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-23-2009 12:37 PM
I can't give a date at the moment, sorry

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-23-2009 12:18 PM
Well, thank you for your answer. The problem for us is that this feature was the one that convinced us to buy the premium license... then we are really impatient to get it.
Do you have any estimation on when the 3.5.1 version will be released?
Do you have any estimation on when the 3.5.1 version will be released?

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-23-2009 11:58 AM
There is no fix for multiple domain scanning without trust at the moment.
(It was actually by design that this didn't work)
We are looking for a way to implement this in 3.5.1 at the moment.
(It was actually by design that this didn't work)
We are looking for a way to implement this in 3.5.1 at the moment.
