I'm buying 2 new servers, one for db (SQL 2000) and one for service ... both servers will be equiped with Windows 2003 server (2008 in the future).
I'd like to ask:
- I understand that the more HW equiped are them, the more performances is lansweeper, but what do you think should be a good compromise between costs and HW equiped for each server? One or two processors? Dual or quad core? How much RAM? I was direct my choice on 2 servers equiped with one single quad core processors with 4GB RAM ... you know I have much more than 10.000 PC on my network ...
- I'm using SQL 2000: do you think could be better to upgrade to SQL 2008? Do you know a rapid/secure mode to "pass" all data from 2000 to 2008? ... I think itsn't easy ...