
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2010 10:12 PM
Ok, I stumbled upon an interesting bug or at least maybe this is the way it is designed.
I’ll explain by example. Let’s say I have two laptops.
One is WS123-BOB which connected to the LAN on 3/17/2010 and Lansweeper ran a full scan (via active scanning). Here are the specifics:
The other laptop is WS345-JANE which connected via our VPN on 3/15/2010 and IP Range Scanning found it and scanned it. Here are the specifics:
For two weeks neither laptop connects to the network either physically on the LAN or via VPN.
Today WS123-BOB connects via VPN and is assigned IP 145.199.193.36 (same IP WS345-JANE had two weeks earlier).
I manually run lstrigger.exe from a CMD prompt to scan IP 145.199.193.36 and in the errorlog.txt it returns the message:
WS123-BOB is in the database, just not with this IP. Is this the way it was designed or am I missing something?
Would the IP range scanning do the same thing, or would it actually pick up on this?
After this experience, I manually ran lsclient.exe on this machine with the /scanonip parameter and a scan was properly initiated. Now the entry for WS123-BOB changed to IP 145.199.193.36.
Thanks
Sebouh
I’ll explain by example. Let’s say I have two laptops.
One is WS123-BOB which connected to the LAN on 3/17/2010 and Lansweeper ran a full scan (via active scanning). Here are the specifics:
Name: WS123-BOB
IP: 10.40.1.234
FQDN: WS123-BOB.mycompany.com
The other laptop is WS345-JANE which connected via our VPN on 3/15/2010 and IP Range Scanning found it and scanned it. Here are the specifics:
Name: WS345-JANE
IP: 145.199.193.36
FQDN: WS345-JANE.mycompany.com
For two weeks neither laptop connects to the network either physically on the LAN or via VPN.
Today WS123-BOB connects via VPN and is assigned IP 145.199.193.36 (same IP WS345-JANE had two weeks earlier).
I manually run lstrigger.exe from a CMD prompt to scan IP 145.199.193.36 and in the errorlog.txt it returns the message:
4/1/2010 1:06:26 PM: PROD\145.199.193.36\1 : Lstrigger only works for computers that are already in the database
WS123-BOB is in the database, just not with this IP. Is this the way it was designed or am I missing something?
Would the IP range scanning do the same thing, or would it actually pick up on this?
After this experience, I manually ran lsclient.exe on this machine with the /scanonip parameter and a scan was properly initiated. Now the entry for WS123-BOB changed to IP 145.199.193.36.
Thanks
Sebouh
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Archive
4 REPLIES 4

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-07-2010 07:00 PM
Ok, dissappointing. I was hoping to find a way to schedule scans on one specific subnet more frequently than once per day.

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-07-2010 06:59 PM
Like I said: You can't lstrigger an ip address, only a hostname.

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-07-2010 06:54 PM
Strange, I'm sure it worked for a machine I know was on the network via VPN. I saw updated scan information. Perhaps it was already in the database with that IP.
Here is the syntax:
"C:\Program Files\Lansweeper\Actions\lstrigger.exe" dev-server.mydomain.com 192.168.1.141 MYDOMAIN
Thanks
Sebouh
Here is the syntax:
"C:\Program Files\Lansweeper\Actions\lstrigger.exe" dev-server.mydomain.com 192.168.1.141 MYDOMAIN
Thanks
Sebouh

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-02-2010 10:55 AM
Could you post the syntax you used for lstrigger please.
You can't lstrigger an ip address, only a hostname.
You can't lstrigger an ip address, only a hostname.
