→ 🚀What's New? Join Us for the Fall Product Launch! Register Now !
‎10-05-2023 02:50 PM - last edited on ‎04-01-2024 01:20 PM by Mercedes_O
Hi,
I have a problem with Lansweeper, the servers outside my network that have Kubernetes are not added to Lansweeper, some appear at first but then disappear and others never appear at all.
Solved! Go to Solution.
‎10-05-2023 03:20 PM
Hello there!
We indeed have seen this before, it seems that servers with Kubernetes are merged due to fake MAC addresses.
In general, when Lansweeper scans your assets (or when the asset is created manually), a unique identifier is created based on the scanned/submitted information. For non-Windows assets, this unique identifier is the MAC address of the asset (if Lansweeper was able to scan this information or if this information was provided). If the MAC address is not available, the IP address will be used instead. More information on this unique identifier can be found in the following knowledgebase article: https://www.lansweeper.com/knowledgebase/how-lansweeper-uniquely-identifies-assets/
When saving the scanned information in the database, Lansweeper will first check if this unique identifier already exists. If this is the case, the existing asset will be updated and if not, the new asset will be added. With this in mind, if a (newly) scanned asset (or one of the linked components) shares one (or more) MAC address(es) with another asset, the scanned asset will have the same identifier and will, as such, merge or update the existing asset. At this point, this would be the expected behavior. When an asset is merged into another asset, this should be listed in the Comments tab of the asset that still exists.
We presume this may be the case here. If this is the case, there is a workaround for this (unwanted) asset merging by adding the affected MAC address(es) to an internal list in the Lansweeper database (tsysMacBlacklist). Adding the common MAC Address(es) to tsysMacBlacklist will prevent Lansweeper from using the common MAC address(es) to uniquely identify assets and will allow both assets to be added to the database.
To blacklist the shared MAC address(es) that is/are causing the asset merging, you can do the following:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mn5ium1nyphalh9/InterfaceScanDebugger.zip?dl=0
https://www.lansweeper.com/knowledgebase/backing-up-your-installation/
Just to be sure everything was processed correctly, please restart the Lansweeper Server service, as the MAC blacklist is cached in the service memory. Afterward, try rescanning your device.
INSERT INTO tsysMacBlacklist (Mac, Comment) VALUES ('AA:BB:CC:00:11:22', 'Exclusion name')
GO
UPDATE tsysupdate SET MacBlacklist = GETDATE()
‎10-05-2023 03:20 PM
Hello there!
We indeed have seen this before, it seems that servers with Kubernetes are merged due to fake MAC addresses.
In general, when Lansweeper scans your assets (or when the asset is created manually), a unique identifier is created based on the scanned/submitted information. For non-Windows assets, this unique identifier is the MAC address of the asset (if Lansweeper was able to scan this information or if this information was provided). If the MAC address is not available, the IP address will be used instead. More information on this unique identifier can be found in the following knowledgebase article: https://www.lansweeper.com/knowledgebase/how-lansweeper-uniquely-identifies-assets/
When saving the scanned information in the database, Lansweeper will first check if this unique identifier already exists. If this is the case, the existing asset will be updated and if not, the new asset will be added. With this in mind, if a (newly) scanned asset (or one of the linked components) shares one (or more) MAC address(es) with another asset, the scanned asset will have the same identifier and will, as such, merge or update the existing asset. At this point, this would be the expected behavior. When an asset is merged into another asset, this should be listed in the Comments tab of the asset that still exists.
We presume this may be the case here. If this is the case, there is a workaround for this (unwanted) asset merging by adding the affected MAC address(es) to an internal list in the Lansweeper database (tsysMacBlacklist). Adding the common MAC Address(es) to tsysMacBlacklist will prevent Lansweeper from using the common MAC address(es) to uniquely identify assets and will allow both assets to be added to the database.
To blacklist the shared MAC address(es) that is/are causing the asset merging, you can do the following:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mn5ium1nyphalh9/InterfaceScanDebugger.zip?dl=0
https://www.lansweeper.com/knowledgebase/backing-up-your-installation/
Just to be sure everything was processed correctly, please restart the Lansweeper Server service, as the MAC blacklist is cached in the service memory. Afterward, try rescanning your device.
INSERT INTO tsysMacBlacklist (Mac, Comment) VALUES ('AA:BB:CC:00:11:22', 'Exclusion name')
GO
UPDATE tsysupdate SET MacBlacklist = GETDATE()
Experience Lansweeper with your own data. Sign up now for a 14-day free trial.
Try Now